Tuesday, February 2, 2021

The mighty plough plane

 

Or plow plane in the US.

Here is a tool that doesn't get much love anymore.  True, some where rather showy and expensive, often used as presentation piece.  But for the usual working man, they may not sport all the bells and whistles, be a tad cankerous to adjust the fence straight and parallel to the body and stay there !

Nonetheless, they are still useful in your modern tool kit.  Especially if you ever try to cut a groove with a dado set on a table saw on smaller pieces and would like to keep all your fingers intact.

My wooden Plows.  From L-R
Okines, London 1740-1770 (one of my oldest tools)
G. Davis, Birmingham England 1821-1876
Greenfield Tool Co , Greenfield USA 1851-1883
All of them are shown with their irons removed.  
They are also shown in the order I acquired them

They are quiet, efficient and yes, do not takes much time to cut your grooves.  Because they are set rank. Hint, the cutting end is rather stout.

So lets have a look at common ailments and how to address them.

Disclosure, this blog is the result of a back and forth conversation via Messenger with a friend who just acquired one.  

My friend in question.  Did not realized until he mentioned it
 that he was on the latest Lee Valley catalog cover..  It's a small world after all (sing along :-)

With his permission, here are the pics of his new acquisition.  These next 4 pics from Sylvain, Bazz, Bazinet.  We met years ago in Ottawa.  We were both members of The Ottawa Woodworker Association and the Outaouais Valley Wood carvers .  If you have such clubs were you live, highly recommend joining one.  If you want to see what a sharp tool looks like, ask a carver, we are fanatics about our cutting edges.  Fun fact, we look at the cut surfaces left by the tool when critiquing carvings :-)

Auburn Tool Co NY 1864-1893.  
Model No 90 Handled plow plane.
Yes it is missing its irons.


Notice the fence is skewed a bit

Yes, it is a tad grimy and would benefit from a light wash.
The plane body and fence are Beechwood, the arms Apple wood and the locking nuts Boxwood


For comparison, here is a "new" one from Jim Bode site. 

And here is a rarely seen plow plane :-) (same Auburn model).
Yes the fence is mounted up side down... Why, oh why?
If you do not know how a tool work, please do not take it apart :-( 
From Rubylane antique

What I normally used to cleaned the wooden parts of my tools.
Not shown is the first thing I use to clean them Murphy oil soap

And the stuff I used to clean the metal parts.
Missing is AUTOSOL which I used last to clean and protect.
Krud Kutter I used first before dunking parts in Evaporust, making it last longer.
The two sizes containers of Evaporust, I used in the past, 
now I only buy it by the jug having a "few" tools to clean :-)
I keep the empty containers to re-used the stuff many times and 
not putting the dirty stuff back in my clean jugs.
BTW being loaded with iron particles once used up, it does wonder to kill some weeds and keep your grass greener :-) Yes, very safe

There are wood and metal plow planes, for this entry we will be focusing on the traditional wooden plows.

They originally came with a graduated set of 8 tapered cutters. Most often, they will be found in the wild with either one single blade already installed and the set long separated and MIA, or none at all.

My Harlequin set of plow cutters.
Some are sneck irons, some are straight.
The sneck feature is at the top, enabling you to tap the iron backward to reduce the cut. 
Not all irons have it and his Auburn does not.

 Can we get replacement blades?  YES, singles or sets often shows up in tool mongers inventory. Expect to pay about US $100 for a complete match set.  Expensive?  As with all antique tools, supply is limited and spare parts will cost you more than what you pay for the tool.  And if you are lucky you can sometimes spot them in misc. box of hardware at flea markets sales.  Often mixed in with chisels and screwdrivers.  I always rummage thru those and found the occasional good chisels without a handle for peanuts (pocket changes)  And yes the odd plow cutter.  Hint look for a groove in the back.

HOWEVER not all irons will fit your plows.  First they are tapered.  That meant that unless you have the right taper in conjunction with the tapered wedge and the ensemble fit nice and tight in the tool body, we have a problem.  You may not be able to chinch the blade down securely or be able to adjust out enough blade to cut.  Remember we want to set it up for a rank cut (thick shavings)

Look how thick the tapered iron is at the cutting edge.
I measured mine, most are 5/16 in thick and tapered down to 1/8 in.
I have what seems to be an oddball that is only 1/4 in thick at the cutting edge

Three solutions: 1- Make a new wedge (easier) or 2- Replace the iron. Easiest, if you have another, or 

3 - Modify the iron to suit (not recommended).

Another issue, is the centering slot in the back of the iron.  These were hand cuts and it shows.

Common issues: The slot is not straight up and down, the slot does not match the plane sole (metal plate on side, call the skate) or is offset enough to cause problems.  Iron should fit the skate and be centered

More often than not the slot is too narrow to fit on the sole plate.  That last part is crucial to ensure a good solid fit that will not be deflected in use.  I repeat, for proper operation the slot must engage the sole piece.  That is actually easy to correct, more latter.

Poor centering caused by a thick plate unable to
 sit inside the V groove in the back of iron

If your plane did not came with a set of matching 8 graduated cutters (as they are most often found) you can get by with an Harlequin set.  Meaning the set is made up of various makers, which may or may not fit correctly.  Don't panic...yet :-) 

A complete match set of plow planes irons from 1/8 to 5/8.
1/8, 3/16, 1/4, 5/16, 3/8, 7/16, 1/2, 5/8
Notice how the cutting end is cut narrower, 
the top of the blade cinch down by the wedge remain constant width.
That is done to keep the cutting edge centered on the skate   
Pic from Jim Bode tools

An easy way to address the centering problem with the iron slot not engaging the skate, is to simply file the skate in a small V shape.  CAUTION, go easy, keep it centered by using the same amount of filing on both sides. It DOES NOT NEED to be wide nor coming to a point (sharp) and you DO NOT want to shorten the skate.  We just want to taper it down to engage the V slot in the cutter. Stop often to check your progress.  The skate does not need to fully seat inside the groove, it just need to register. You can also widen the groove in the back of the cutter with a saw file (triangular) In both case remove just enough to make it register.

Of course its would be easier to remove the skate first, but caution, the screws may be really rusted in place and they may snap on you.  A bad thing :-(  Shoot them with a penetrant liquid, let it sit for a while, scratch the slots clean  and make sure to use a proper fit in screwdriver.  If it does not budge STOP leave it alone and regroup.

Notice how the iron slot is not really engaging the skate.
Skate edge is way thicker than the narrow slot.
That could cause the iron to be skewed under pressure during the cut, ruining your groove.
Remember we are taking a thick shaving.

Other issues to look at are the body.  Is it flat or curved?  It must be flat.  Similar for the metal sole plate (skate) and the fence.  Note that the body sides are not too critical, they can have a small hump or hollow, but we want to spot the bowed ones.

I'm using my LV winding stick to check it.
Plenty straight, we do not need machinist precision.
The long shallow U shape piece of metal is the Depth "suggester". 
Yes, I know, its called the depth stop, but as in most planes, wood or metal, they offer more a suggestion than definite depth stops :-) Some like on his Auburn have a screw on the side to lock the setting.  Remember to loosen it before attempting to reset it 
Check its operation.  While the sole of it is steel the screw mechanism has a brass knob 
on top and they sometimes froze solid.  
DO NOT force it, try lubrication, WD 40 or liquid wrench should do the trick. 

and the other side.  Good to go

Next check the skates alignments.  
In this pic, the front plate is not quite in line with the back one
There is a slight bend toward the cutter.  Either remove and fix or simply file it straight, gently.
In my case it so small as to not cause me any problems. So I left it alone.
Only catch is, as you get down to the smallest sized iron, it could cause you some grief.
But being an old military man, I tend to pick my battles wisely. 

Similarly check the fence surface bearing on your work edge.
They get wear and are sometimes damaged.

My almost 300 years old Okines has a damaged tip on one side of its fence

Which someone long ago try to fixed with two nails.
That poor thing need a lot of tender loving care, but because of its age and rarity,
 I must be very conservative in my attempts to fix it.
Not a plane in my user stable.


How is the fence adjusted and locked in place? There are no shortage of patented ideas to solve the vexing problem of getting the fence to move straight with out skewing and to lock it down once set.

Once unlocked, the fence should move smoothly without much wobble.  Often times, the arm get lodged solidly inside the plane body since they are a tight fit to start with in a bid to minimized the play.  Years and years of improper storage and the wood swell and shrink causing it to jam.

My Okines had its arms pretty well stuck for years, managed to take it out yesterday.  Its been acclimated to my shop for years by now and I run a dehumidifier near my plane till in the summer. 

 

Its arms are secured in place by a small wedge, one on each sides.
Notice the round finial at the end of the wedge, same shape as the blade wedge.
That is one clue about its old age, they long changed to a more elliptical shape 

Next take a look at the arms that hold the fence.  Often times they are wobbly and can twist.

The G Davis has loose rivets securing the arms to the fence.
Notice the one on the left is slightly twisted out of true.
With the fence removed, there is a lot of play in the arms

The method most often encountered is a single screw from the bottom.
This is the Greenfield one, my woody user.

You can see a small gap, but the screws are tight and so are the arms.  
Its been working fine, not touching it.


Must make them secured.  But I will caution you about wanting to glue down the arms to the fence.

I never seen them glued, just secured by either a rivet or a screw.  You want them tight, but guessing without being glued down and secured via a single fastener allows them to flex a bit as needed without cracking as the body and arms swell and shrink.  You also have a cross grain situation if gluing.

How do you adjust it without being skewed?  Simply place a piece of wood or what have you of the correct width against the plane body and snug up the fence to it. Easy Peasy.  I usually used a piece of wood since it very easy to trim to the correct width.

Then there is the often damaged means of locking the fence down. 

Damaged thread on spindle and or wood nuts, missing or improper replacement wedges 

(as in the G Davis above) etc,

Typical small damages on the threaded arms.
Notice the small chips on the threads.
Nothing serious.  
Missing or heavily chipped (big chunks) threads however are a non starter.
Cannot be fixed :-(

This is how another friend of mine, Matt, solved a problem with a stripped thread portion.  Cut if off and reassembled.  Yes shorter arms but at least useable

There is not much we can do about damaged threads, but as long as the nut can move in and out without binding, we should be good.

Next looks at the locking nuts.

See that darker coloured vertical line on the nut.
When I first saw it I thought it was a drip of paint.
Nope, its a filler to stabilized the crack.
Not my repair

From the top

and the bottom.
Crack ran right thru

Of course that extra space that has been filled has enlarged the inside diameter
 of the threaded nut, but it still work great, and yes it has a bit of play, but chinch tight..
How about trying to clamp the split portion tight while gluing?  
Danger, Danger Mr Robinson, you will more than likely break it

If left alone nut would had cracked apart and probably would had been long discarded, rendering the plane useless.  If you want to try this type of repair caution do not force whatever material too tight, you run the risk of making it worse, or break it apart. Smaller checked cracks can be secured with glue, either crazy glue or epoxy depending on crack width, but be careful not to get glues on the threads and take the nut out first, you do not want to glue it to the arms.

Thinking of making your own or repairing damages threads with a wood threader kit?
3/4 in is just about the right size...

... but the thread pitch is different.
That is the Woodstock threader kit sold at various woodworking tools supplies house.

Don't forget to also inspects the two flat locking nut

That one has a crack also (Boxwood) but still strong and work fine.
Notice the flat side goes against the plane body


While the face with some decorations, goes on the outside.
I often see them installed backward.
But I never saw a plow plane with its fence installed upside down
 before this morning while researching them :-)

Missing wedge or wrong replacement.  You are going to have to make a new one.  Don't sweat it, its not that complicated.  If you want to be period correct for the plane, take a look at the original finial at the end of the wedge, or if too damaged or missing, simply look it up on line, chances are you will find pictures of your plane.  The wedge shape at the end often helps denote a particular maker and period.

The actual angle of the wedge are typically between 5ish and 7 degrees ( in my humble experiments).  But remember that the wedge AND the blade make up the final taper.  

Hard to measured.  Tried various tools, this one was the easier to read.
about 6 ish  degrees for the Greenfield

The two others I could not measure because the finials are sticking up from the incline.
So I lined them up on a flat surface and trying to see if they were close to each other

As you can see, with the Greenfield in the middle,
The one in back G Davis, is steeper than 6.
The one in front, Okines is about the same as the Greenfield , 6 ish

Armed with this knowledge, make a graduated set of taper shaped in thin plywood .  Says something like 5.5, 6. 6.5, 7 degrees, that would help you get the angle of the tapered mortise.  But remember that space is occupied by BOTH the wedge AND the blade.

Another way to guesstimate it close, is to shove in a wad of aluminum foil.  Carefully remove and you get the shape.  That is what I use to figured out the taper of socket chisels.  And writing this I think I`m overdue to make myself a set of graduated templates.  I have a few planes in the cue awaiting new wedges :-) 

Be prepared to make a few adjustments, but remember to keep the surfaces straight and level.  On moulding planes you have to sometimes account for a titled mortise, but on the Plows, these are rather straight forward (pun intended).  If you never tried making wedges, try on a Plow first, lot simpler.  

The other critical part of the wedge is at the end.  When shaped correctly it help curve out and expel the shavings on the side.   Look at the pics above by the angle levels, they are all shaped different.  Since it is sitting much higher than say a molding plane, it would not be too fuzzy and trap shavings under.   


These 3 following pictures are the wedge from the G.Davis plane.  It was originally broken in two, long ago, someone attempt a repair by nailing it back together and using hide glue...and made a mess.  Not sure about the wood species, but it is rather hard and brittle.  The end is polished to a glassy shine.

So when I got it, I try to excavated most of the nail, but I had to leave a piece of it.  I made sure nothing interfered and glue the pieces back (3 and a bit) with epoxy. Its working fine.  I retained the original.

On this side you can see the one glue line.  Does not look too bad...

Until you flipped it over. That nail made quite a mess resulting in a few compound cracks.
Nearly destroyed it but the other end of the nail being clinch over, kept it together long enough 
for me to salvaged it.  I have no idea when that ham-fisted repair was made.
That is the surface that lock the blade down.  I made no attempts to disguised the repair.

On the other side, I was not able to completely remove the nail, so to avoid more damages, I simply left a piece of it then filed it down flat later.  Oh, that rusty nail shine inside :-)

On the other side, you can se two glue lines.
Its been to war and back, and still work


Once you have assessed its condition, look up the maker's marks on it and do some research to get some idea of its rarity or not, BEFORE attempting any corrective actions.  If its a common one (Auburn and Greenfield models shown), I will not hesitate to do some more drastic repairs.   Some are really, worth a lot of money, I would then temper my enthusiasm for repairs and preserved as much as I can.  Even if that mean, I cannot fix it without...  Lots of plow planes were presentation pieces.  Congrats you just made your own :-)

Good news is next time you will know what to look for before purchasing and know how to address common issues.

Bob, getting his BP under control with help from Dr Rudy.

Who then carry on with Diva, either she needs it or not :-)


Bob, who really appreciate that little diversion from Sylvain and the one my friend Chris send me chasing down the ID of an old Canadian military ammo can from 1944.  Very cool, I'm now firing on 5 cylinders, one more to go in this old V6 and just like my former Lincoln engine, my water pump is inside :-)




Friday, December 18, 2020

The Metric system in Canada

 Being a Dominion of the British Empire, Canada took to using the Imperial measurement system.

Map of the British empire

This is what I grew up with, feet, inches, pounds, miles per hour, gallons (which are slightly different than the US Gal ) and etc.

In my everyday woodworking pursuits, I used strictly inches and foot.  It use a base 12 system; 

12 inches in a foot.  This make it easy to express ratio or fractions such as 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 and etc.



I like this fraction system because it help me visualized better object size and relation, both in my head and by looking at it.  But it is deemed archaic and somewhat convoluted to the uninitiated.

Enter the Metric system, base 10, makes everything divisible or multiplied by 10 easy to switch unit of measurements.  Simple and clean isn't it?  


And being used more and more around the world, it make sense to standardized.  There are all kinds of horror stories in the engineering world where small errors of conversion between both measurements systems from each side of the pond caused all kinds of Oups!!

Rockets blew up at launch, space craft missed their trajectory by... a lot, planes ran out of fuel.

 Here in Canada, we have been standardizing to the Metric system kicking and screaming since the 70s.

Between political and public resistances, this is where we are today, after almost 50 years of metrification.

I do this all the time without even thinking about it :-)

My kids generation, born in the seventies, grew up learning Metric, not the Imperial system.

It created some confusion when I was working with the kids in the shop.  They could not understand my inches and me their centimeters.  I long solved that problem by making sure to remove any measuring devices that had metric on it.  It's 6 and three little bars Dad :-)

Today I drive in Km per hour, pay my gas about Cdn $1.00 a litter, read my temperature in Celcius but adjust my thermostats in Fahrenheit.  My weight and height are in feet and pounds, kitchen is still staunchly Imperial also.  We set the stove temperature in Fahrenheit , use measurements like quart, cup, spoon etc. 

And in woodworking?  NO metric please, NO way.  QEII was my Commander In Chief  for over 37 years, I am a staunch Imperialist's when it comes to measurements.  Long live my foot :-)


If you look at Canadian woodworking magazines, you will find often, oh surprise, feet and inches versus metric.

So after almost 50 years later, we Canadian are still slowly being dragged to the dark side of Metric, kicking and screaming. You will have to wait for the passing of my generations before making more headways I'm afraid :-)


Bob, putting his "foot" down on this Metric non sense :-)


Saturday, December 5, 2020

RIP Lincoln MKZ June 2010-Oct 2020

I loved that car, paid just about twice as much as my last two cars combined, a Toyota 94 and a Nissan 02, but worth every penny.

My ride for the last 10 years

This was our second Lincolns, having bought earlier a used 92 Town Car Cartier edition.  Heather had a long history of kidney problems following radiation treatments for an earlier cancer. We bought this car, she jokingly referred to as her kidney cushion car 

Our first Lincoln, a 92 Town car.  Quite a beast to park.  
Told my boss jokingly at work that I needed a bigger parking spot :-)
Yes, it is a humungous American car.

First time I try to change a flat tire on the side of the road...
Managed to get the wheel off  but then, the jack collapsed.
Yes that car was a tad on the heavy side :-)
The CAA driver that came to my rescue, busted his 1.5 ton jack. 

We really loved that car air suspension.  The car had a slow air leak, the rear suspension would settled after a while.  Upon starting the car, it would raise up.  The bags finally went kaput on the highway  and destroyed one of the rear tire.   Did not felt much, but drivers around me were flashings me their lights, so I pulled over to see what the fuzz was all about.  Oh, look at that I'm riding on 3 wheels. 

Impressive suspension :-)  And yes we rebuilt the suspension, but replaced the air bags with  a strut kit that mimic the ride but would survived the cold weather much longer.   

Meanwhile our day to day driver car, a Nissan 2002 was getting long in the tooth, I donated it to an In-law after rebuilding its suspension at 350,000 kms.

At the time we were stationed in Bagotville Qc (CF-18 Hornets), about 2-1/2 hours north of Quebec city.  By February 2011 I had just completed 35 years of service, my pension was maxed out, time to seriously consider retirement.  

Really love my time working on the CF18 (two tours),
 but did not felt like retiring in a snow bank, why we retired here
 in Nova Scotia were Heather was from. 

The plan was then to buy our "retirement car" before leaving the service.  Wanted something comfortable for long distance driving, after being spoiled with the Town car.

With kids in Ontario and Nova Scotia and Heather going to African Violets conventions and shows all over the US and Canada, we tend to rack up kms pretty fast. 

You have no ideas how much fun (?) it is to drive with show plants all over :-)

We went looking to replace the Nissan, and found this gem on a dealer lot.  


The car at the dealer lot when purchased.

We bought it in Chicoutimi in early March 2011.  The car was a return from a short lease, it had only 11,445 Kms and was like new with full warranty.

She was built in June 2010 at the Hermosillo plant in Mexico.  My Nissan was also built in Mexico and my Toyota was built in Canada.  Truly "world' cars.

The only small annoyance was that we bought it in March and without winter tires.  Which meant we could not drive it until the mandatory winter tires season ended  a few weeks later.  Well worth the wait, and at that time we briefly had 3 cars in the yard: The Nissan 02, the Lincolns 92 and 10.  

April 2011, the three amigos in the yard

These three cars left with us, the Nissan was dropped off earlier in New Brunswick, both Lincolns were driven here.

We sold the 92 later on after I retired and were down to just the MKZ.  It quickly racked up KMs for reasons explained above.

It went on to be a very reliable car and took us to many destinations.

Its first problem was a dead battery went we came back from Cuba in Jan 2014.  I had parked the car inside at the airport, but nose out toward the outside, it's an open, not closed in, parking structure.  There was a winter storm it froze and battery went dead.  And to think I paid extra to park "inside" at the airport. 

In 2015 after her lung operation for her cancer, we went to Boston and meet up with Ralph and his lovely wife Diane

Waiting to board our ferry from Yarmouth NS to Bar Harbour Me

The Inn were we met.
The car is riding on its spare donut tire on the front passenger side.
Bought a new tire the following day.


Our little side trip to Boston was the cause of it's first major repair.  On our way to the Inn to meet Ralph and Diane I hit a piece of steel sticking out from an exposed expansion joint on an overpass on the highway.  Was a hell of a hard bang, scrapped the tire and damaged the suspension.
When I pulled over the side to check the damages there were 5 other cars trying to replace their flat tires...

Ended up later rebuilding the suspension on all 4 wheels, had two broken springs and lost another tire to damages sustained then.

Later in retirement, the next costly repairs were caused by *&?%$ squirrels
Apparently this happens a lot around here with retiree.  Huh? Yes because our cars stay parked longer, not going to work everyday.  First it was a lost of heat indication.  They replaced the thermostat but it turns out to had been caused by a chewed wiring harness which they had to replaced after.
Said thermostat is inside the engine, not cheap to replace. 

After Heather passed away, Rudy and I went on on many trips from Nova Scotia to Ontario.

He is sleeping besides me, safely harnessed to the car seat belt receptacle, air bag is off

OH look, I wonder how that building got in the way :-)
That is the Lee Valley store in Ottawa On.

By June 2016, I had already rack up 138,932 Kms.
By that Fall me and Rudy went travelling all over on the way to Ontario 
visiting family and friends after Heather passed away that Spring :-(

In late summer 2017 Jean and I went to visits our sons in Ontario. Unbeknown to us we took a squirrel along for the ride.

On our way the AC start working less and less efficiently and it was a hot summer day.  So had to get the car fixed before returning home.  Could not get an appointment with any Lincoln or Ford dealers, but managed to get one with a local Air condition service shop. 

This is what they found.
A squirrel got trapped in there, demolished the AC cooler and try 
to scratch his way out on the main radiator.
When they pulled him off, the rad was leaking like a sieve.
End up replacing both the rad and the cooler

Besides a problem with the seats heating/cooling module, and the occasional AC leaks (2), that was it for problems on this car.  The most reliable car I owned so far.  And I drove mostly Toyotas.

An early snow storm in Riviere Du Loup Qc 2018 on our way home.
Our usual stopping place on our way in or out of home on our way to family and friends.
I like the smile face :-)

By now you probably realized that I really enjoyed this car and was  planning to keep it longer.  But unbeknown to me, there was a time bomb ticking under the hood.  That Duratec engine has one critical design flaw.  The water pump is inside the engine and driven by the timing chain.

This mean one of two failure scenarios:

Being bathing inside the oil area, if it leak it will quickly contaminate the oil and cause the engine to seized OR, like in my case, the pump will seized causing the timing chain to skip, damaged the engine and lock up solidly.  Both scenario will scrap the engine, necessitating an engine change.  Warning signs?  None!


The car took us, Jean and I on our honeymoon this October, driving around Cap Breton NS, having to stay inside our COVID 19 Atlantic bubble.  

On our honeymoon, driving care free

As usual, trouble free trip, until I parked the car in the yard.  It never started again since. Just a tick tick sound.  Put it on my small battery tender, after a few days still NOGO, called CAA, driver tried to boost it, louder tick tick noises but still wont start.

Tow it to my local Ford dealer, they told me battery was dead, I authorized its replacement, then they said starter was not engaging, authorized its replacement but after they called back stating that engine appears to be seized.  To investigate further they said would have to open engine.  I stopped all work then.  My other options given was to replace the engine.  A used one with 195,000 kms and 90 days warranty would be over $5000 installed (about what the car would be worth with less Kms)  Not worth it .

Settled my bill $910 and tow the car to another garage for a second opinion.  Went with a small Mom and Pop garage, not another dealer.  Should had gone there first!!!!


Car at dealer awaiting to be tow one more time

Took a pic of its last Kms.
316,734 Kms

On its way to its last post...

Turns out the engine was seized alright,  my mechanic called it the classic Ford  3.5 Ltr V6 water pump scenario.  Brought the car in on a Saturday evening after hours.  He opened his shop and waited for me to arrive.  Told me he would put it up the hoist first thing on Monday.  Later that evening he send me his diagnostic complete with a small video showing me the problem.  He said he was curious and could not wait till Monday :-)

What you see and hear inside the oil filler cap opening is the timing chain 
rattling over the sprocket turning. The chain cannot turn, water pump is seized
and so is now the engine... Scrap

My only annoyance is that I had no idea the engine was going to self destruct.  It is a well  known and documented problem(?) with that engine.   I would had expect Ford technicians to gives me a heads up, or at least knew why my engine seized, its not that hard to tell looking thru the oil filler cap as shown above.   Now, in its defense that engine has a life expectancy of 300,000 kms, mine ran trouble free until 316,734.  So in effect I got a Ford bonus 16,734 extra kms :-)  Between the water pump location in the engine, the noise suppression inside the engine compartment and the cabin, you don't hear much.  Oh and that pump location makes it very expensive to repair.  Would you believed US $2K to 3K to replace that pump?  Owners took Ford to court over it, but lawsuit has just been dismissed,  having failed to prove that Ford knowingly did them wrong.   But would you know it, there also another legal challenge from Mazda owners of CX9, yes same Ford engine (Made in Japan, called MZ1) same Hara-Kiri disposition with the water pump.


As you can see, there is not much room under the hood.
To removed the rad previously they had to take the whole front of the car off.
To replace the water pump, you also take apart the front in order to access the front engine cover exposing the timing chain which has to be removed also.  
While in there you also replaced all the plastic shoes on the belt tensioners.
Very, very time consuming job, in avg 10-12 hours,  hence why it is designed to last a long time.
Pump has a double gasket seal and weep hole in between both rubber gaskets.
If  I knew about this I would had replaced that car around 200,000 kms (they all seems to last that long, but from 200,000 to 300,000 it's getting dicy) or I would had the pump replaced.

Here in Halifax, one Lincoln Dealer has one mechanic that does only that, replacing those water pumps in these Duratec engine.  He does one a day and they have a fixed price of Cdn $1452.90

That Ford Duratec engine V6 3.5 ltr is used in many Ford and yes, Nissan vehicles and the odd Volvo's.

Also goes by the family names Ford Cyclone and MZ1 in Japan

If you have one of those engines, I urged you to keep an eye on your Kms.  You been warned.

And if you felt safer because it wont be happening to you... Surprise, most engines have a life of 250,000 kms before major failures.  Ford is not the only one to bury the water pump inside the engine, but most other used the flat back side of the timing belt to drive it. Hence a pump failure will not dump coolant inside oil pan and take out your engine.

So what did I do with my car?  Its not worth it for me to replaced the engine, but my mechanic has a young son with his first pick up truck.  Offer to donate it to them.  Could be a good father and son project if they can find an engine for it.  Would make them a great winter car; AWD, traction and stability control, it really sticks to the road.  And if not, should be able to get some money out of it.

I don't need a new lawn ornament :-)

In exchange he wiped out my bill and bought my new battery in the car.  Everybody is happy.

And bonus I found myself a good mechanic.  When you find one, keep him or her


The car as I left it for the last time...

After a few weeks of learning more about engines, came to the conclusion that they are making throw away cars.  Built in obsolescence is one thing, but built in self destruct is another!!!

What will I buy next?  I dunno, I really loved my Lincolns, and yes, I would buy another with same engine.  But I am in no rush to buy my next comfy car.  We cannot travel too far, used to be inside the Atlantic bubble, now that bubble is busted, and we can only travel within our own county region. That little Chevy Spark we got for city driving is plenty good for now.  But I would never entertained driving to Ontario with it :-)

The Chevy Spark and the Lincoln MKZ
About $25 to fill the Spark, $80 to fill the MKZ.
Did not knew at the time I took this pic upon our return, but engine is seized :-(

I already made my draft budget for 2021 before this latest monkey wrench in it, so sometimes around Summer perhaps, if the need arise.  Or I can always rent a car.

Since we recently traded her truck for that Spark, we miss the truck, so we thought perhaps replace the truck?  The prices are insane!!! I can buy one heck of a fully loaded Lincoln Continental or even a Navigator for cheaper, get serious!

Then we thought maybe a SUV.  There is a 2017 MKC here with low 51,000 Kms.  Drove it alongside the same year Ford Escape, nice ride, noticeable differences between both similar platform.  Changes the wheels, the suspension, the seat, it's a different vehicle.  I like it but it is bit small for my liking.

My Ford dealer in town just got two in, 2016 MKX ( I suspect they know me too well :-)

Nice, would not consider 2014 or 15 they had that stupid Microsoft drop down menus on the screen.  I drove a 2014 MKZ while waiting for my car to be serviced once.  Hated the stupid thing, had to pull over and read the book to figured out how to put the heat on my seat. Dumb dumb design.  In 2016 they started rolling out the new system in use today.

Knowing what I now know about the engines that powered them.  I would stay away from 4 cylinders with turbos, and rather stay with that V6 but would need to keep an eye on the Kms.

And finally, I'm getting challenged to find pictures, I recently also lost my Back Up 1 Tera Bytes HD :-(

RIP Western Digital.
I'm starting to wonder which Gods have I pissed off lately? :-)



Bob, down to a one car family



 




.