In the beginning, our planes had only one blade. Usually tapered in thickness, being thicker at the cutting edge. Said cutting edge was a hardened piece of steel (tool steel) forged welded to a softer iron blade. Similar to how axes are bited.
Everything worked fine, but the addition of the second blade (cap iron, chip breaker) around 1760 accomplished two things:
- It helped curled up the shavings faster near the cutting action, and
- It trapped water condensation between both blades. A perfect recipe for rust to take hold.
I'm guessing they recognized that problem early on because for a while they were covering the back of the cap iron (chipbreaker) with some sort of blueish coating.
Take a look at the two chip breaker back.
The older Stanley one (second from left) has a blueish coating.
The newer one to its right does not anymore, they long stop doing that.
But that practice long preceded Stanley. I do not know if it was the same process (coating) but you can often see remnants of it on older cap irons.
You can clearly see some sort of coating remnants peeling off (abraded).
Whatever is left is still solidly attached.
So the question is: Does it helped at all?
Debatable but here is what i often see.
Yesterday while re-conciliating my physical count with my data records, I came across an early Canadian plane, Dawson, from Montreal. So even if I said I was done and had already cleaned up and put stuff away, you know, I just could not sleep if I did not stop the rust carnage's
Dawson Montreal
1851-1874
And the poor blade stuck inside. Its a small smoother.
Look pretty sad, but nothing that i cannot fix.
So put my tally sheet down, looked around and came up with a few more blades
In progress. Still shows brown spots after the wire wheel,
back soaking after a quick sanding with 80 grit
Recognized the blade?
Evaporust, brushed, wire wheel, spot sanded, rust eraser then wiped and buffed with Autosol
The blade may be practically worn out, but there is still cutting steel at the end and plenty of good metal to raise a good edge.
Talking of worn out blade, that one is definitively pass its best before due date.
So why bother?
Because it is part of the tool history.
All I am after is to stop further rust damages.
Pic in progress
Done. Also addressed some damages to the edges
I came across lots of damaged top edge, from using a metal hammer harder than the softer iron blade.
That would be just about any decent hammer BTW. A Brass hammer head would deform before it deformed the soft iron. These must be addressed to stop the damages and to render the blade safer to be hit later on.
I often see also lateral damages to the blade, from hitting the sides to adjust lateral. Which is why Stanley invented the lateral adjuster later on :-)
This one has damages to both top and sides, but it is the cap iron, not the blade!!!
Here is an interesting details I came across in this short marathon.
How the cap iron is fastened to the blade.
Notice how the screw shrunk.
Interestingly, the bolt diameter and thread sizes seems to have remains
pretty well the same all along and not just Stanley.
Which just add to the confusion, which belongs to which?
Hint the bolt should go all the way thru cap iron and be flushed on the nut side.
These last two have the same threads but not cut the same.
Take a look at the base
The screw length changes along the way it was attached. I have no idea which methods came first in what order, but we all know it finished with the shorter screw to attach a thin steel cap iron to a thin steel cutter.
In no particular historical order
This one, rarely come across this one, use a separate nut and screw
The nut is filed to slide between the slots of the blade.
Attached
This one is yet different
No more loose nut to loose.
The nut is solidly embedded into the cap iron
The one most often seen, mostly British tools
The brass dome nut is also embedded solidly
This is a new one on me.
That is from my Dawson blade
The nut is not attached, but is machined from a thicker stock
Pretty solid, probably the most secured
And of course the Stanley design we are all familiar with.
The top horizontal slot is to engage the depth of cut adjuster.
This design forced Stanley to move the hole location on the blade slot from the top to the bottom.
Because we rely on that slot located at the top of the chip breaker to adjust our cutter in and out... Guess what?
It had to be adjustable to compensate for the inevitable wear and tear on the blade which will be sharpened umpteen time in its life. That's the reason for the slot in the blade. Problem is, they are a lot of Stanley clones out there but no one ever seems to came up with a standard location ...
Notice anything different??
If you do, that is the reason why it gives you headaches when you attempt to swap blades :-)
And if you thought that the two outer ones were the same...
NO, not even close. Both now on right.
From L-R Stanley's regular bench planes iron (first 3),
Stanley No 113 compass plane blade, and a transitional plane blade.
In these pics I lined them up by the cap iron edge, not the cutting edge. The three regular Stanley are various vintages and the hole location changed a bit, but not enough to cause much trouble.
The Compass plane No 113 however will have a hard time to give you any cutter exposed to cut if someone swapped the cap iron or the whole blade assembly with a regular one. That is because of the flex sole, the frog surface is longer than on regular planes. Buyer beware. Oh and also the lever cap is slightly different, longer. Also sometimes swapped on unsuspecting would be buyer. Finding original spare parts? You will have better luck lining up to get your bucket of prop wash filled :-)
Similarly, in a transitional plane, the yoke adjuster sit higher on the frog, so the slot location is yet a bit higher. because the small frog sit on top of a 2-1/2 in thick chunk of wood.
And to add to the fun, others would be Stanley clones used all kind of slight variations in slot location, more pronounced than the slight variation shown. Oh and they varies location thru the years. Ever noticed why most modern blades maker have a disclaimer on their Stanley replacement blades? May not fit all models produced thru the years etc
Moral of this story, to keep your sanity and let the plane works as intended, if you want to swap blade, you may want to re-use the original cap iron, just saying.
And since I had the Evaporust bath set up again, I may as well ...
This is what I ended up with and it is all Dawson's fault :-)
And then I drank a Coke to dissolve all the rust I have no doubt ingested.
Like my Dad, I am a Coke man, we both flunked the Pepsi challenge :-)
Dad was so pissed when they tried to changed his Coke. It taste like $@^# Pepsi!!
Bob, all rusted out from de-rusting umpteen tools saving them from a slow but inexorable death.
You know, they used to say, You are dust you will return to dust when you die. Well with today's micro plastics being everywhere, soon it will be: You are plastic you will be recycled when you die :-)